Home > News & Commentary > Food Law & Policy > The FDA knew long ago that red dye No. 3 causes cancer. Why did it take so long to ban it?

The FDA knew long ago that red dye No. 3 causes cancer. Why did it take so long to ban it?

By Karen Kaplan. Originally published in the Los Angeles Times on January 15, 2025.

FLPC Faculty Director Emily Broad Leib is quoted in this piece.

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that the much-maligned red dye No. 3 will be banned in the United States because it has been shown to cause cancer in animals.

The decision, lauded by consumer advocacy groups, comes a full 25 years after scientists at the agency determined that rats fed large amounts of the artificial color additive were much more likely to develop malignant thyroid tumors than rats who weren’t given the food coloring. They also had an increased incidence of benign tumors and growths that can be precursors to cancer.

Those findings prompted the FDA to declare in 1990 that red dye No. 3 could not be used in cosmetics or drugs applied to the skin. The reason for the decision was clear: A federal law known as the Delaney clause says no color additive can be considered safe if it has been shown to cause cancer in animals or people.

Yet the dye remained a legal food coloring. It’s in the bright red cherries that dress up a bowl of Del Monte’s fruit cocktail. It makes Nesquik’s strawberry milk a pleasing shade of pink. It also colors beef jerky, fruit rollscandy, ice cream and scores of other processed products.

Read the full article.

Pin It on Pinterest